A lesser lustre for the Australian dollar

April 13th, 2012

Apart from the fact that it was a silly idea anyway, Paul Howes’ plea for changes to the Reserve Bank’s charter to allow it to try to actively influence the value of the Australian dollar was poorly timed, given that the dollar is now trading at its lowest levels in three months and about 7.5 cents below last year’s peak.

That could, of course, change. Part of the explanation for the sharp fall in the dollar against the US dollar over the past three weeks in particular is the renewed anxiety about the stability of the eurozone, a nervousness that has increased sharply in the past week as fresh doubts about the ability of Spain and Italy to implement their tough fiscal programs surfaced.

While the eurozone and US – awash with the liquidity pumped out by their central banks risk assets – and the US sharemarket in particular had been on something of a run over the past three months, it appeared that the European Ponzi trick of the European Central Bank lending € 1 trillion of cheap three-year money to southern European banks so that they could buy their countries’ sovereign debt to keep bond yields down had worked.

The ECB interventions, however, weren’t solutions to the eurozone’s problems but simply bought some breathing space and, it transpires, a false sense of optimism that the worst of the eurozone crisis was over – which took some of the pressure off the politicians charged with implementing austerity programs.

All through last year it was obvious that whenever the risks of an imminent implosion in Europe receded the Australian dollar – and its Canadian counterpart – rose as all the cheap liquidity parked around the globe was deployed into ‘riskier’ assets. Conversely, at the first hint of bad news in Europe, or the US, those funds flooded out of risk assets and back into the perceived safe havens of US Treasuries and gold.

The combination of the fresh wobbles in Europe and last week’s weak US employment numbers mean that this is very much a ‘risk on’ environment and therefore the speculative support for the Australian dollar – attractive by the high real returns in the bond market – isn’t there.

There is, of course, another reason for the dollar’s weakness and one that could keep a lid on its value for some time.

Our terms of trade have peaked, at least for the moment, with commodity prices down across the board, driven by the deliberate slowing in China’s growth rate and the maturation of the infrastructure phase of its development.

China is now targeting growth of 7.5 per cent this year, which would be its lowest rate of growth in eight years, and there are some concerns that it might undershoot even that target. With both the European and US economies still stalling and the Chinese deliberately slowing their domestic activity it isn’t surprising that China’s growth rate has tapered (On the cusp of a China rebalancing, April 11).

If commodity prices don’t surge again, and the eurozone remains a threat to global stability and growth – as one would expect it to be for some years even if the potential implosions of the too-big-to-fail/too-big-to-rescue southern European economies are avoided – it would difficult to imagine the Australian dollar climbing back towards the $US1.10 level unless for some reason there was an historic loss of confidence in the US dollar.

With the Reserve Bank signalling last week that it is inclined, the March quarter CPI outcome permitting, to cut official rates again next month, there is another reason for our dollar to be a little weaker.

It should, however, remain at levels that are still historically high because, while China’s growth rate has slowed it is still solid growth over a vastly larger economic base than it had before it ignited the resources boom and resource companies are still scrambling to expand their output to supply that growth.

That is having, and will continue to have, a significant adverse impact on manufacturing industry and tourism. There is a major restructuring of the non-resource side of the economy occurring, with considerable job losses. A highly contractionary budget, combined with the looming introduction of the carbon tax, isn’t going to help.

A significant further weakening in the value of the dollar – a return to its pre-boom levels – however, while highly unlikely, might be an even worse outcome as it would probably signal that the resources boom was over and that the hundreds of billions of dollars being invested in expanding the sector’s capacity had been wasted.

Read full article at businessspectator.com.au

$AUD sold off amid rate cut talk

March 29th, 2012

The Australian dollar nursed its losses across the board today as investors pared long positions amid uncertainties about China’s economic growth and weakness in Asian stocks.

The dollar fell as far as $US1.0341, from $US1.0392 in New York, having lost 1 per cent this week. It was last at $US1.0368 and looked set to test last week’s trough of $US1.0336. A break there would take it to levels not seen since January 17.

“It’s more than likely it will go through that level because, since it rallied to around $US1.0550 on Tuesday, the theme of China slowing down has taken hold of markets and undermined the cross rates,” said a trader at a European bank in Singapore.

The Aussie also suffered against the euro, pound and Swiss franc, plumbing fresh 2012 lows.
The currency has been undermined by two consecutive days of losses in Asian stocks, hurt by concerns about growth prospects in China and the United States.

That, combined with positioning ahead of the end of the month and quarter, as well as the fiscal year in Japan, added even more pain for commodity currencies.

Weaker sentiment gave speculators an excuse to increase bets the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) may cut interest rates to 4.00 per cent next week.

As recently as last week, RBA officials were sounding content with the current rate of 4.25 per cent. Yet interbank futures now imply a 36 per cent chance of an easing at the bank’s April 3 meeting, while swaps imply a 40 per cent probability.

Australian debt futures extended recent gains ahead of major resistance. The three-year contract jumped 0.06 points to 96.470, having touched a six-week high of 96.510, the 38.2 percent of December-March decline.

The 10-year contract added 0.075 points to 95.935, an area that has become very congested since February.

Support for the Aussie is found at $US1.0336, the March trough and lower edge of the 20-day Bollinger band, with resistance at seen at $US1.0450.

The Australian dollar was dragged lower by Japanese investors selling for the close of their financial year on March 31. The Aussie skidded 0.4 per cent on the day to 85.74 yen , from 87.58 on Tuesday, the highest this week.

Reuters

Taxing mining, tackling Dutch Disease and depreciating the dollar

March 24th, 2012

The mining boom is making Australia potentially wealthier, but also creating problems because of the high exchange rate. What should government policies be?

There are two issues, and it is very important that they are distinguished. One concerns taxes and the other concerns the exchange rate.

The aim of taxation is that some of the benefits of the boom go to the Australian community as a whole and not just to Australian shareholders and employees, and certainly not mainly to foreign owners. Taxation is probably the main channel (though not the only one) through which Australia benefits from the boom.

There are the normal company and income taxes, revenue from which will be increased by the boom. Additionally, when there are exceptionally high profits – as there have been – they should, in my view, be taxed through something like a super-profits tax.

All these extra taxes would be borne both by the foreign owners of the mining companies and associated firms, and by owners who are Australian residents. Indirectly, executives and other employees and suppliers of the mining firms would also be affected.

I now come to the second policy issue. This concerns the exchange rate. Australia’s exchange rate has greatly appreciated since the mining boom began, and this has certainly been a problem for other actual and potential export industries, as well as for import-competing industries. Appreciation is caused both by the huge rise in mining incomes owing to higher prices of iron ore and coal, and to the massive inflow of foreign capital into the sector, leading to an investment boom. Of course, there are other factors – notably the low interest rates abroad.

Obvious victims of appreciation are some parts of manufacturing, domestic tourism, and the export-of-education industry. Also included should be potential exporting firms that would have developed if the exchange rate had been lower. This is called the “Dutch Disease problem” because the Netherlands was believed to have once gone through that experience.

Does the Dutch Disease require policy action by the government designed to moderate the appreciation – and thus to depreciate the exchange rate somewhat? This is a big issue and a difficult question to answer.

Read full article at theconversation.edu.au

The AUD is not your friend

March 16th, 2012

Well, not if you are short the AUD because of all that hard landing business. Or, if you are an Australian exporter.

The Australian dollar has long been seen as a China/commodities trade, but Macquarie’s Brian Redican reckons that’s no longer the case. The currency is increasingly influenced by external factors, rather than the country’s own ever-growing mining sector, or its monetary and fiscal policy.

And this, he says, is a momentous shift — so much so that Macquarie now sees the AUD remaining around its current levels for several years, and only gradually sliding to $1.05 by 2015. Their previous forecast was a fall below USD parity by the end of this year.

Those external factors will sound familiar:

While there are several explanations for this performance, Australia’s rock solid AAA credit rating, relatively high interest rates and more interest from official investors, such as central banks and sovereign wealth funds are generally considered to be important. Moreover, aggressive “quantitative easing” from major central banks may have intensified these pressures.

It’s now reached the point where 75 per cent of national government bond issuance is held offshore. And yields are high against other AAA sovereign bonds: close to 4 per cent for 10-year maturities.

Redican says that, ever since QE2, modelling the Australian dollar on commodities prices and domestic monetary policy just doesn’t cut it anymore:

The escalation of quantitative easing in the second half of 2010 appears to have been so decisive in breaking the model because it pushed down Australian bond yields (which should traditionally have been reflected in a lower currency) even as the RBA warned of rate hikes, while at the same time prompted investors to reallocate funds to the A$. Finally, the positive impact on commodity markets was not as great as QE1.

If, however, we augment this simple model with some additional factors, such as the proportion of bonds held offshore and the current account deficit adjusted for imputed dividend payments, then the model tracks the A$ much more closely over the recent period (see Figure 4). Thus, this does seem to suggest that there has been a significant change in the drivers of the Australia in recent years.

And it’s likely to continue:

Of course, some analysts have suggested that because such a high proportion of the bond market is now owned offshore, the only way is down. And that means that this positive boost to the A$has now run its course. In our view, this argument is unsatisfactory as it suggests that a strong government balance sheet (ie falling debt) will result in a weaker currency (as there are fewer bonds to buy).

The problem is that at least some of those foreign investors (well, the SWFs at least) could just increase their holdings of other AUD-denominated assets, such as farms. Or they could expand into semi-government bonds (which are rated a notch below triple-A and have correspondingly higher yields, despite being effectively backed by the federal government). Either way, the AUD is supported.

The RBA has noted this, but has signalled it is setting the bar very high for any intervention. And indeed, unemployment is low and inflation is within its target range.

That may change, however, he says:

If it is correct that the A$ is now driven as much by offshore investor portfolio flows as it is by domestic fundamentals, then it also signals a momentous shift in how analysts should think about the A$. Certainly in 1997-98, 2000-01 and 2008-09 the A$ played a key “shock absorber” role for the domestic economy during difficult periods. Now, however, it may well be that it is the currency that is forcing change on the economy, rather than helping the adjustment.

For that reason, it is worth pointing out that the upgrades to the A$ do not reflect a more upbeat view of the domestic economy. Rather, it is potential for the A$ to remain higher for longer that is one factor underpinning our caution on domestic growth.

In our view, however, the current level of the A$ is not consistent with the economy remaining near full employment. The A$ is clearly damaging large parts of industry, and the longer it remains high, the more damage it will do. Our expectation that the currency will remain high should not, therefore, be viewed as validating its current level.

That’s not unthinkable either — Macquarie, incidentally, thinks the current situation of near-full employment is not supported by the AUD being strong for longer. And as Neil wrote this week, it’s not helping the Australian stock market either, whose performance of late has been woeful against those of other developed economies. There was apparently talk among forex traders last month that Australian corporates themselves were buying AUD, suggesting they were already nervous of the scenario Redican has outlined.

It’s a rather awkward place for an economy to be.

Read full article at ftalphaville.ft.com

Chinese trade deficit drags dollar down

March 12th, 2012

The Australian dollar nursed losses against its US counterpart on Monday, weighed by uncertainty over China after the world’s second biggest economy posted a shocking trade deficit.

The shed around third of a cent to buy $US1.0526 in late trade, versus $US1.0567 in New York late Friday.

Traders cited selling from macro-funds, with talk of buying interest all the way down to $US1.0500.

Weak stocks in China, Hong Kong and South Korea as well a sharp drop in the yuan/USD also pushed the Aussie down.

Still, the Antipodean currency has displayed remarkable resilience to China’s huge $US31.5 billion trade deficit, which blew away forecasts of a $US5 billion deficit.

The Australian dollar’s modest losses were contained by a strong rise in Chinese imports from Australia.

The currency, however, could face more downward pressure offshore, where a large number of bears may take the terrible reading as further proof China is hitting speed bumps.

“It would not surprise me if the Aussie moved below $US1.0500 in London and New York… There may be a bit more softness in the Aussie and strength with the USD against most currencies,” said Joseph Capurso, a strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

The Aussie was already under pressure on Friday after upbeat US payrolls data sent the USD sharply higher across the board as it lowered the chance of further stimulus from the US Federal Reserve.
The Fed holds its policy meeting on Tuesday.

“I don’t think the Fed will be as optimistic as markets expect…People are putting too much emphasis on the U.S. payrolls and not enough on what is happening elsewhere in the U.S. economy, for example income growth,” said Capurso.

Capurso said he did not expect the Fed to appear bullish and that could disappoint markets and push risk assets lower.
The Aussie also lost ground against the yen, falling 0.5 per cent to 86.65 yen but remained within reach of recent multi-month highs. It climbed to 88.0 yen earlier this month, levels not seen since May.

The Aussie has been a stellar performer against the yen this year, gaining a whopping 10 per cent, aided by recent easing by the Bank of Japan, which has made the yen the funding currency of choice for carry trades.

Read full article at smh.com.au

AUD tumbles on bad growth figures

March 8th, 2012

Strong AUD lures OS Aussie IT staff home

February 28th, 2012

CBA Forex strategist admit errors in AUD predictions

February 22nd, 2012

AUD Dollar climbs on Greek hopes

February 18th, 2012

AUD surges on surprise Jobless rate drop

February 16th, 2012